Zolak & Bertrand: What would you give up for Justin Fields?
On Wednesday’s edition of Zolak & Bertrand, the crew discusses what they’d be willing to give up for the Patriots to land Justin Fields.
I’d do a 3rd-round pick…
Phil Perry: What do you think about the idea of trading for (Justin) Fields, and would you be okay with that if it took a second round pick?
Scott Zolak: Not a two. I’d be interested at 3 or 4. Absolutely. That would sort of be a bridge guy until you find the next quarterback. And I would not do that to have a guy and sit the young quarterback, because I would think this team needs help. The problem with Fieldsis, if he does play well, then you got to make a decision next year and you’re going to pay him $45 million. That’s the risk.
Maybe that’s why you want to hold on to a young quarterback, because you have control of the guy for 4 or 5 years. 5 if you’re a first round, four if you’re second at a low number. I think you get a good player where they’re at right now. Considering how many tackles, how many corners, how many receivers are in this draft. You need that pick to use to get a player for the future, not to go give the Chicago Bears it so they could have Caleb Williams and a number two. No, that that helps the Bears way too much.
Phil Perry: A second round pick is too rich for me. A third round pick now I’m interested, because I’ve got a guy for a year who I think has a real ceiling that has yet to be untapped. We know what he can do with his legs. He’s got a great arm. I think it’s a question of more reps, better coaching, better situation, and you’d have to do a lot in the immediate future to obviously improve what is arguably the worst offensive situation, quote unquote, in football right now. But I think you might be able to get him for a third.
To me, it’s realistic for the Patriots to give up a high third rounder. They’re at the top of the third round obviously, get that guy for a year and your point is a good one. Maybe he plays well and then you have to pay him. I would say it’s a good problem to have.
Scott Zolak: High-end problem.
Phil Perry: That’s what you’re looking for.
Scott Zolak: I would like to have that problem. I just threw it out there because that’s a cautionary thing that potentially could happen.