Marc Bertrand: Why Alex Van Pelt doesn’t get a pass because of Drake Maye’s development
On Thursday’s edition of Zolak & Bertrand, Marc “Beetle” Bertrand explained why Alex Van Pelt doesn’t deserve a pass because of Drake Maye’s development.
Look at where the offense ranks…
Marc Bertrand:
But last year, the Patriots finished. 3rd to last with 276.2 yards per game and in terms of points per game by the end, they were tied for dead last at 13.9 with the Carolina Panthers. Do you want to know where they are now?
Scott Zolak:
Pretty close to that.
Marc Bertrand:
Yeah, pretty damn close to that number. In fact, they rank in yards in the NFL, dead last in offensive yardage per game at 271. .1. They are second to last in points scored. What is it about Alex Van Pelt, other than him developing Drake Maye, that anyone should be happy with? What is it?
Scott Zolak:
I don’t know.
Marc Bertrand:
For nine weeks, we watched an offense that really did not try to break its mold. It’s vanilla boring mold. You saw a little bit of imagination being used. Some of it was damn ugly, like the flea flicker just to run a screen for 8 yards, but I appreciate the effort, Alex Van Pelt. But I’m sorry when it comes to offensive coordinator, you don’t get a pass because you’re developing a quarterback. You don’t need an OC to do that. You need an OC to develop an offense for that quarterback that results in that quarterback’s abilities racking up yards, racking up points, and ultimately wins, and I just don’t know how you’re going to get there with this guy. So, I would say if I were Jerod Mayo, dude pump the brakes. You didn’t hire a quarterbacks coach; you hired an offensive coordinator. He’s only doing a small part of the job by getting Drake Maye to be a better pro quarterback.
Listen to the full segment!
8 takeaways as Patriots' young players step up in win over Bears
What to take away from the New England Patriots’ win over the Chicago Bears on Sunday.
Sunday’s game between the New England Patriots and Chicago Bears featured two teams trying to build towards a long-term picture, after drafting quarterbacks in the top three of the 2024 NFL Draft. While the Bears came in having had more success in the 2024 season, it was the Patriots who looked to be the more on track of the two teams, in their 19-3 win.
That was true in two directions. The Patriots look like they made some strides in this game – especially schematically. At the same time Chicago had its own struggles that the Pats took advantage of but didn’t necessarily cause on their own.
Still, it was a dominant performance. New England out-gained Chicago 328 to 142 in total yards, while holding the Bears to just 1-of-14 on third downs.
The defense was able to do that despite being put in bad spots early in the game. In the first half, the Bears’ average starting field position was at their own 42 yard line, with their worst spot coming at the 30. Despite that, they walked away from all five drives with just a field goal to show for it.
Coming into this game, a number of the Patriots’ and Bears’ weaknesses lined up (ex. the Patriots’ rushing offense, the Bears’ run defense). New England ended up winning most of those ‘weakness-on-weakness’ matchups within the game. While those units may still need to improve more moving forwards, this could certainly be a sort of ‘get-right game’ for the Patriots in certain areas.
Nowhere saw the impact of that more than at the line of scrimmage. Let’s start there as we get to the takeaways from this game…