Patriots Mailbag: The trade deadline and quarterbacks

• Do you see the Patriots turning to Will Grier in the coming weeks to provide a spark to the offense?

  — Mark Cleland (@MCleland) October 17, 2023

  Going off what the coaching staff has said, they seemed impressed with the work Will Grier has put in since joining the team in late September. However, they have also stressed how difficult it is to prepare a backup quarterback for game action in-season. That reality seemed to be reflected in the way the roster was constructed for last week’s game with Grier one of two inactive quarterbacks, and not labeled as the emergency QB option.

  It’s not unrealistic to think Grier could end up playing for the Patriots at some point this season. But right now him seeing any significant snaps seems like a future proposition, not an immediate one.

• https://x.com/ZOxley32/status/1714347013779656780?s=20

  As mentioned above, the team has stressed how difficult it has been to get backup quarterbacks prepared. Given that Malik Cunningham has been practicing mainly as a wide receiver, it’d be tough to expect him to play quarterback for a full game in the near future. His usage in package plays will likely continue, but a full-time QB change doesn’t seem imminent.

• Greg Lockley on Twitter: "With the 5th year option looming, surely the time for Mac has passed and the Patriots MUST find a viable QB1 (walk-on or in-waiting) for 2024?The 5th year option has to be off the table, and you can't sign Mac to a new deal (at least one he would accept). / Twitter"

  With the 5th year option looming, surely the time for Mac has passed and the Patriots MUST find a viable QB1 (walk-on or in-waiting) for 2024?The 5th year option has to be off the table, and you can't sign Mac to a new deal (at least one he would accept).

  I’m not really sure what the question is here, but yes the clock has just about run out on the flexibility provided by Mac Jones’ rookie contract. That reality should be a factor in the Patriots’ future quarterback plans, especially considering if and when to take a quarterback in this year’s NFL Draft.

• Andrew Caraway on Twitter: "Would adding a true 3rd down back help this offense. A guy I keep thinking about is Tyler Goodson who played at Iowa. He's currently on the Colts PS. I would've liked to see JJ Taylor in that role but that ship seems to have sailed. / Twitter"

  Would adding a true 3rd down back help this offense. A guy I keep thinking about is Tyler Goodson who played at Iowa. He's currently on the Colts PS. I would've liked to see JJ Taylor in that role but that ship seems to have sailed.

  The Patriots offense has been missing that third-down back role for almost three years now – basically since James White got hurt early in the 2021 season. Since then, the team hasn’t really added players with the primary skillset needed for that role.

  In fact, the closest they’ve come is the addition of Ty Montgomery. If the Patriots want more production in the passing game from the running backs this year, Montgomery is the best answer at this point. However, he’s been limited to begin with playing just 29 offensive snaps – and only four of those have come at wide receiver.

  This offseason, adding a true passing-down pack should be on the Patriots’ to-do list, whether it be in the draft or via free agency. But given how complex that role is in their offense, it makes more sense in the context of this season to use a player already familiar with the playbook, rather than looking elsewhere.

• Jeff on Twitter: "Could DeVante Parker be a possible trade piece? He and a pick for someone like Tee Higgins? / Twitter"

  Could DeVante Parker be a possible trade piece? He and a pick for someone like Tee Higgins?

  It’s hard to see a scenario where the Patriots could trade away DeVante Parker right now without giving up something additional in return. At 31 years old with most of his contract guaranteed for the 2024 season, the Patriots would likely need to either eat most of his contract or overpay for another team to take it on.

  In the scenario described above, there’s really no incentive for the Bengals to take on Parker between his contract and recent lack of production. He’s not a replacement for Higgins at this point, and the trade would be a significant blow to Cincinnati’s offense. If the Patriots were going to include him in a trade for Tee Higgins they’d need to attach serious draft capital. The asking price for Higgins probably wouldn’t change whether or not Parker is involved in the deal.

• Bret Judkins on Twitter: "What's the rebuild strategy for staff and players? Staff - do you fire, hire, Players - trade possibilities (that make sense for the future), FA signings, and who/what do you draft to build on? / Twitter"

  What's the rebuild strategy for staff and players? Staff - do you fire, hire, Players - trade possibilities (that make sense for the future), FA signings, and who/what do you draft to build on?

  I appreciate the question Bret, but this is a full offseason plan. That will require more than just a mailbag. Don’t worry though, we’ll have that as it’s own feature once the season is over.

• 🕸️Phil and his musings: 🕸️ 🏪 on Twitter: "How much football per week does one Mr Barth watch this time of year? / Twitter"

  How much football per week does one Mr Barth watch this time of year?

  In terms of live games? We’re currently in the middle of a stretch where there is at least one Division-I college or NFL game on every day for 50 days in a row, with the next day without a game being Thanksgiving Eve. For that window, here’s what a week in my life looks like…

  Monday night I’ll watch Monday Night Football in full. Tuesday and Wednesday night I’ll causally follow the college football games in action, usually having them on in the background while working, making dinner, or watching the Bruins or Celtics. Thursday night I’ll lock in on Thursday Night Football, and might pull up a college game on a second screen if there’s a good game or good matchup going on. Friday night is similar to Tuesday and Wednesday, although again I’ll make a point of watching a certain matchup if it’s one that really sticks out to me (like Stanford-Colorado last week).

  Saturday starts with College Gameday in the morning, followed by the full slate of college football. As for Sunday, the Patriots are my main focus, so I may miss out on a window while working. For instance if the Patriots play at 1:00, I’m usually working through the end of the 4:00 window but will catch Sunday Night Football. For Sunday night games I’ll catch the 1:00, but miss most of the 4:00 getting to the game and taking care of pregame coverage. 4:00 games home games I miss both other windows, but for 4:00 home games I usually watch most of the 1:00 Red Zone window.

  So yeah, that’s the schedule (which doesn’t factor in re-watching games for a various number of reasons). Can’t complain. How do I manage? I’ll leave you with these wise words…

  Tom Fornelli on Twitter: "There are no bad games only soft viewers. https://t.co/s2uLoVUViu / Twitter"

  There are no bad games only soft viewers. https://t.co/s2uLoVUViu

• Alex Barth is a writer and digital producer for 985TheSportsHub.com. Any opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of 98.5 The Sports Hub, Beasley Media Group, or any subsidiaries. Thoughts? Comments? Questions? Looking for a podcast guest? Let him know on Twitter @RealAlexBarth or via email at abarth@985TheSportsHub.com.