Andrew Callahan: “Not a mistake” for Patriots to select coach before GM
During this morning’s Toucher & Hardy radio program, Andrew Callahan expressed surprise that the team is leaning towards staying in-house for the GM search through the draft. He suggests that the front office may be attributing past issues to Bill Belichick and that they should have started the GM search immediately if they knew Jerod Mayo was going to be the head coach for a whole year.
Callahan mentions that going into the NFL Draft without a GM limits potential candidates, as some may not want to wait until May to know their job and the people they will be working with. He acknowledges that there are candidates with differences in using analytics, but the majority of potential hires are either local or under the Patriots tree, indicating continuity in positional requirements and team-building philosophy. Fred Toucher questions whether limiting the candidate pool is a good approach, to which Callahan emphasizes the need to modernize processes by incorporating tracking data, different models, and analytics to catch up with other successful franchises. He believes in keeping the foundation but updating processes to find better ways to identify talent.
WATCH HERE:
TRANSCRIPT:
Andrew Callahan: Look, I will just say that I am very surprised that they are leaning towards staying in-house through the draft, given the track record of this front office. But that paints a picture to me that they looked at the personnel and went, “Yeah, this is Bill’s fault.” And I would say you’re probably right, but I think all the information he was gathering or has been given is from the people who are still there. So, as far as the GM search goes, I don’t think it’s a wise move to go through the draft. There is precedent. The Bills did this. Sean McDermott got in Doug Whaley’s state as a GM. Then they hired Brandon Beane after the draft in ’17. They drafted Josh Allen a year later, and all things obviously worked out for them. But I just think that if you knew Gerrard for a whole year is going to be your head coach, you’d want to start working on that GM search from day one. And I know they’ve done research on external candidates for GM, asking folks, “Hey, what was it like to work with so-and-so?” So they have those answers? And apparently, to them, those answers weren’t good enough to say, “We’re going to open up a search right away.” Instead, they go to the guys we already have.
Fred Toucher: You mentioned going into the NFL Draft without a GM. Does this further limit the GM candidates that would want to come?
Andrew Callahan: Yes, 100%. Because some guys look and say, “I don’t want to wait till May. I want to know what my job is. I want to know the people I’m working with. I want to get here and go.” I’ll say, though, there is a difference between the example I just cited and the one you just did, because everyone here is going to be working from largely the same personnel playbook. There will be differences. I think there are candidates they could bring in who say, “Hey, these are analytics. This is how we want to use them. This is how they work in an area or a department where the Patriots don’t really use them in their draft evaluation.” I’m not saying it’s better or worse, but when you look at the pool of candidates or the list we all drew up a week ago, right? It starts with Dave Ziegler or Bob Quinn or John Robinson, or maybe Mike Borgonzi from the Chiefs. All these guys are either local or came under the Patriots tree. And it’s clear with the draft hiring and what the Krafts are not doing with their front office; they’re going to be working with the same positional requirements and all the things they believe in when building a team.
Fred Toucher: Do you like that?
Andrew Callahan: I do, but the bigger part of this is the word “modernize,” which I know Mike Gardi has already said sitting in this chair Tuesdays with you guys. I’ve had conversations with Mike. I’ve had my own conversations with other people, thinking it’s fair to keep the foundation in place. You’re two years removed from a playoff season with a rookie quarterback that fell apart down the stretch. You’ve had a lot of bad signings, a lot of bad drafts, but when you incorporate stuff like I just mentioned – some more tracking data or different models or analytics that can help you out, which have propelled the Eagles ahead or other franchises like that – the Browns, then, I think can kind of catch up. But as far as what they believe in – smart, tough, good under pressure – I mean, that’s Belichick stuff. It’s stuff that works and can still work if you update your processes to catch up and find better ways to identify those guys.
LISTEN HERE:
Nick Gemelli is a Producer on Toucher & Hardy and contributor for 985thesportshub.com. Follow Nick at @NickGemelli on Twitter.
Follow @ToucherandHardy on Twitter and @Toucherandhardyofficial to keep up with the show!