Mazz: I’m rooting for the Red Sox to finish in last place
The Boston Red Sox are in danger of finishing in last place in the American League East again. Mazz talks about why he is rooting for that to happen.
Mazz: Now, as has been pointed out and this to me is borderline unbelievable, but I’m kind of rooting for it….They’re only a couple of games out of last place. The Blue Jays have 79 losses and the Red Sox have 76. You’ve still got 11 games left to play. It’s unlikely. But as Sean in Salem has pointed out every time he’s called us in the last three days or whatever, the Red Sox would be the only team to finish last in each of the last three years. It would be a 7th last place finish.
Mazz: And I’ll tell you why I’m rooting for it….Because there’s no way they can talk their way out of that. You know they can sit there if they finish in the middle and go .500 and they can say, “well, we made some steps in the right direction. We finished third in the division. We’ve got some players coming to AAA..”, but if you finish last again then what can you say? “We got better?” You finished last again. What are you talking about? So to me, I’m rooting for it.
Jim Murray: Yeah, I am too, because if you finished third in the division, like there’s kind of an out there. “Well, we’re making small increments. You saw and then we were dealing with some injuries, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah”. You finish last again? You can’t hide from it and maybe it’s another PR black eye that, I mean it won’t happen, but the hope is maybe it pushes them into actually being more aggressive this coming offseason. You can’t hide from last place. Third? You can hide.
Listen to Felger and Mazz from 2-6 every Monday-Friday on 98.5 The Sports Hub, with hosts Mike Felger, Tony “Mazz” Massarotti, and Jim Murray “Big Jim”. You can listen live in the Sports Hub App and subscribe to their podcasts here. Follow @FelgerAndMazz on Twitter to keep up with the show!
The All-Mazz team
When it comes to baseball, here’s a simple question: what do you value? Speed? Power? Defense? Years ago – though I can’t remember exactly when – I posted a list of my favorite players, a group I referred to as the All-Mazz team. I figured it was time for an update, so here is version 2.0.
Before we go much further, let’s offer some guidelines. This isn’t necessarily a list of the best players in baseball history so much as it is a collection of the best players who always drew my attention. These are players I watched during my lifetime, which is to say that they all played after 1980. The large majority of them are Hall-of-Famers or borderline Hall-of-Famers, but that was not a prerequisite. I wasn’t just looking for the best players at each position. I was looking for great players that I’d want in most any kind of game, which brings me back to my value system.
Versatility.
This is, after all, the All-Mazz team.
Here’s my point: are Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds arguably the greatest positional player and pitcher of all-time? Yes. But neither is on this team. I don’t think you’ll find any pure sluggers, either. (Many of them were nothing more than softball players to me.) I love watching great defense as much as anyone, but you have to hit some, too. I generally like players whom I believe can excel in most any situation, under any circumstances. Does that mean you have to be a Gold Glove and a Silver Slugger? No. But it means you need to be a reliable.
Admittedly, these kinds of endeavors are entirely subjective and invariably have some exceptions. Not everyone is a perfect fit. So if you’re the kind of jackhammer who scours lists just to find inconsistency, have at it. You may (or may not) find some here. My guess is that you will. But at the end of the day, I like the guys who were ballplayers, which is a deliberately open-ended description. (Maybe I should clarify players whom I deemed as ballplayers.) They probably all had flaws. But at the end of the day. I could live with them.
And so, who is on the All-Mazz team version 2.0? Take a look below. In a couple of cases, I included a second (or honorable mention) candidate because I couldn’t ultimately decide. As such, either would work. Make of that what you will, but, like everyone, I had certain favorites that just couldn’t eliminate.