Both the Celtics and Cavaliers had trend-breaking nights from three-point range in Game 2
The Cleveland Cavaliers had – by far – their best three-point shooting night of the playoffs in Game 2 of the Eastern Conference Finals against the Boston Celtics. Meanwhile, the Celtics had their worst. Was it a one-off, or a sign of things to come?
In Game 2 of the Eastern Conference Finals on Thursday night at TD Garden, the Cleveland Cavaliers opened things up from three point range. They hit 13 of their 28 three-point shots from beyond the arc in the 118-94 series-tying win over the Boston Celtics.
The performance was a departure for what had come to be the norm for the Cavs in these playoffs. Their 46.4 percent hit rate from deep was a playoff-single-game-high for the Cavaliers, while their 13 total made threes was tied for the most in a playoff game this season. Their 15 outright misses were their second fewest in a playoff game this year, behind Game 4 of the first round when they only attempted 17 threes (and went 4-for-17).
Meanwhile, it was also a performance out of the norm from the Celtics in these playoffs. Their 22.9 percent mark from three was their worst of the playoffs so far this year. They were just 8-of-35 from deep, resulting in their fewest made threes and second-most misses in any playoff game so far this year (they missed 28 in Game 1, but shot 39.1 percent on 18-of-46 shots).
Given that, a big question facing this series as the Celtics try to regain control is this – was that three-point barrage from Cleveland and their own drought on Thursday night an unsustainable one-off, or a sign of things to come?
Let’s start with Cleveland. Coming into Thursday night, the Cavaliers were the worst remaining playoff team in terms of three-point shooting this postseason. Their 8.9 three pointers made per game and 28.3 percent three point percentage both ranked dead last among the teams still competing.
Obviously, that’s not great. But those numbers also aren’t fully indicative of the Cavs’ three-point potential. They were an average three-point team during the regular season, ranking seventh in total three-pointers made and 15th in three point percentage.
During the regular season, the Cavs shot 36.7 percent from three. Prior to Game 2 on Thursday night though, they hadn’t had a single night with a better percentage than that in the playoffs.
That suggests there is at least some room for growth when it comes to the Cavaliers’ three point shooting. Every game probably won’t look like Thursday night, but they’re more likely to get better than worse when comparing the next few games to their first eight of the playoffs.
In order to up the pressure and prevent that from happening, what do the Celtics need to do? After Thursday night’s game, Jaylen Brown cited the team’s offensive issues (which we’ll get to in a second) as disrupting the defense.
“I think just overall we missed some shots, and let that translate, and it’s the playoffs, that can’t happen,” Brown said. “I don’t care if – if you missing shots, you gotta guard a guy on the other end. That allows you to miss more shots if you’re playing defense. But you can’t miss shots and allow them to make shots on the other end. That was unacceptable.” Head coach Joe Mazzulla said something similar in his postgame comments.
Now, how about those Celtics’ offensive issues? They were as uncharacteristic – although in the other direction – as Cleveland’s hot stretch. Coming into Thursday the Celtics were averaging 15.5 three-pointers made per game in the playoffs, which lead the NBA. Their 40.2 three point percentage ranked third.
Unlike the Cavaliers, whose Thursday night performance saw them trend back towards their regular season number, the Celtics’ cold stretch was an anomaly in both in terms of regular season and playoff context.
So what went wrong? Mazzulla noted the Cavaliers’ defensive pressure as part of the reason his team struggled to shoot the basketball.
“Obviously, their ball pressure was better,” he said. “Their pick-up points were higher. I thought they did a better job of kind of closing out into our bodies. Making it seem like we were open and putting some indecision on whether we should shoot it or drive it, and when we did drive it, they did a good job collapsing and making us make the two-on-one read.”
Still, Mazzulla saw opportunities for a team that just went cold. Asked after the game if he liked the three-point looks his team got, he replied “from what I can recall, most of them.”
I’m sure there were a few of them that we could fight for a better shot or better spacing,” he continued.
“But I think, for the most part, they were okay.”
That belief seems to be shared by the Celtics’ leading scorer from the regular season, Jayson Tatum.
“I obviously wish I had made more shots,” Tatum said after the game when asked if it’s been ‘a challenge’ to get the shots he wants. “[I’ve] been in the league long enough that sometimes you just don’t make them. You just have to continue to take the right shots, and it’ll even out. I don’t really get caught up on that. I know how to score the ball.”
Tatum scored 18 points in Game 1 and then 25 in Game 2, but his scoring hasn’t been overly efficient. He’s 14-of-36 (38.9 percent) from the floor for two games, and 2-for-10 from three.
“It’s as simple as sometimes you don’t shoot the ball as well as you would like,” Tatum said after the game, when asked if an injury has impacted him at the beginning of this season (he said no to that part of the question). “You play enough basketball, law of averages, it’ll even out. In the meantime, find a way to win, find a way to impact the game in other ways, scoring is kind of like the least of my worries.”
Expect both teams’ three-point shooting to be a major storyline heading into Game 3, as this series shifts to Cleveland. That next game is Saturday night, with coverage beginning at 8:00 p.m. ET on the BetMGM 98.5 The Sports Hub Celtics Radio Network.
Read more about the Celtics below…