Marc Bertrand: If the Patriots were a better coached team, they beat the Colts
On Monday’s edition of Zolak & Bertrand, Marc “Beetle” Bertrand explained why if the Patriots were a better coached team, they would’ve beat the Colts.
Does there need to be change on the coaching staff?
Marc Bertrand:
I think yesterday you can look at it and say in this league, games are often decided by a score. And when you’re going up against a team that’s one of your peers in terms of talent and record, because I look at the Colts and I say you’re in the same department. Yeah, they’re in the hunt, but they’ve obviously found ways to win games while the Patriots look like a team that finds ways to lose games.
Scott Zolak:
That’s true.
Marc Bertrand:
I think yesterday you could look at it and say if this was a better coach team, you win the game. You’re on the right side of it at the end. And when is that going to flip for this team? Do we think that’s just going to happen? That they’re just going to grow as a coaching staff and get better and become a team next season that in a game like that, they win? Do we think that’s just going to happen or do we think there needs to be change? And I think that’s really what you need to boil it down to. To have a defensive minded head coach and have your defense look that bad throughout the day, but especially on that final drive, it’s inexcusable.
Scott Zolak:
Did they ever send the house one play against Anthony Richardson? You know the guy who clearly doesn’t see the field very well.
Marc Bertrand:
They were criticized for doing that against Matthew Stafford a couple of weeks ago. To have a guy like Anthony Richardson, who as you said, is not a guy who sees the field well. At one point on the broadcast yesterday, they were saying he’s learning how to play the position.
Listen to the full segment!
8 takeaways from the Patriots’ last-second loss to the Colts
How key coaching decisions and situational letdowns left the New England Patriots on the short end of a 25-24 loss to the Indianapolis Colts on Sunday.
The New England Patriots have now lost three games in a row after their 25-24 defeat at the hands of the Indianapolis Colts on Sunday. With the loss, the team falls to 3-10.
In all three of these recent games, coaching was a focal point in the aftermath. Following the loss to the Rams, it was the game plan going into the game that was the major talking point. Last week against Miami, it was the discipline in a penalty-filled game. Although penalties were still somewhat of an issue this week, it’s the in-game game management that should and will get the headlines from this one.
On paper, the Patriots had some key advantages in this one. They outgained the Colts 422 to 253 in total yards, and 6.5 to 4.4 in yards per play. They won the turnover battle two to one, and converted on over 50 percent of their third downs and held the Colts under 50 percent in that category defensively.
Despite that, they come away with the loss. Rather than letting the overall game get away from them, this week it came down to key decisions at big moments in the game that left them chasing.
Specifically, there were chances at the end of each half for the Patriots to make game-altering plays. In both instances, the team came up short. Some of that was on the execution, but the management of the situations by the coaches stands out.
Of course, the end-of-game sequence was the big one, so let’s start there as we get into this week’s takeaways…