Bruins react to difference-making goal, failed challenge vs Canucks
BOSTON — The Bruins lost by the slimmest of margins to the Vancouver Canucks on Tuesday night, and they also felt confident that the difference-making goal would come off the board.
It was old friend Jake DeBrusk (because of course) who tucked in the eventual game-winning goal for his new team, all the offense they’d need in a 2-0 shutout win over the B’s at TD Garden. Parked at the right place at the right time and holding his own against Bruins defenseman Andrew Peeke, DeBrusk tapped in a fortuitous bounce after Quinn Hughes’ point shot deflected off Canucks winger Conor Garland.
But Bruins goaltender Jeremy Swayman had different plans for the Canucks after the puck went in, and so did head coach Joe Sacco. The B’s promptly challenged the goal for a hand-pass.
Unfortunately for Sacco, Swayman, and the B’s, the call on the ice stood. Not enough in the replay for the officials to definitively say the puck deflected off Garland’s glove.
Surely the officials’ tablets aren’t good-enough quality to see where that puck hit. But it was no harm, no foul for the Bruins, who killed off the ensuing delay of game penalty and moved on. But Sacco sounded sure that he thought the game would remain scoreless after his challenge.
“I was [confident] just because of what happened in the past,” Sacco said. “I remember a play where it hit one of our guys’ gloves, and one of our players didn’t move his hand at all and they called it. … It hit [Garland’s] hand, and it went to the eventual goal scorer. Yeah, I thought I was confident, otherwise we wouldn’t have made the call [to challenge].”
Sacco is ostensibly thinking of a disallowed goal from Game 6 of the Bruins’ 2023 playoff series against the Florida Panthers. Ironically, it was DeBrusk who grazed the puck with his glove prior to the goal, which nullified it upon review.
Fast-forward back to Tuesday night. Swayman actually thought it might’ve been a high-stick.
“Obviously I didn’t see the replay, but if I’m reaching up, I know that I’m above the crossbar there,” Swayman said. “So, I thought originally it was a high-stick. I talked to [the official] and he said the replay didn’t show that. It was an unfortunate bounce. That’s hockey.
“We have to go forward, and I think we did a good job of that and kept pressing and did our job well. We just didn’t get the result.”
Despite the drama of the one goal and the somewhat controversial nature of it, the big story in the game was the Bruins’ missed opportunities at the offensive end. They out-shot the Canucks 32-15 on the night, and had a staggering 27-8 advantage in five-on-five scoring chances, as well as a 13-1 edge in high-danger chances. The term “snakebit” comes to mind for this one.
The Bruins have to regroup quickly, because they’re turning around and heading to New York to take on the Islanders in the second leg of a back-to-back on Wednesday night.
Matt Dolloff is a writer and digital content producer for 98.5 The Sports Hub. Read all of his articles here.