Team owner Dan Snyder’s post was safe when the league merely fined the team $10 million, without publicly releasing the results. Two years later, in the wake of an explosive report by Don Van Natta, Seth Wickersham, and Tisha Thompson at ESPN, Snyder has retained Bank of America Securities to help him sell the franchise.
LANDOVER, MD – DECEMBER 03: Washington Redskins owner Daniel Snyder looks on before a game between the New York Giants and Washington Redskins at FedExField on December 3, 2012 in Landover, Maryland. (Photo by Patrick McDermott/Getty Images)
Boston fans may be familiar with Lynch’s firm, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, because DeflateGate lead investigator Ted Wells is a partner there. Like the Wells Report, Lynch’s findings in her review of the Bruins will also be released publicly. Wherever the breakdown in the vetting process occurred, that will be laid bare. That is bad news for the Bruins’ front office, particularly anyone that had a hand in vetting Miller before signing him. However, it’s unclear just how high the problem went, and even when we have the results in front of us, blame and punishment may be hard to dole out.
In a situation like this, when Bruins ownership appears to be on a mission to restore the reputation of the spoked ‘B,’ the easiest move may be to dismiss both Neely and Sweeney, and anyone else whose hands got too dirty. Even if we’re talking about a rogue scout, or otherwise sloppy or dishonest vetting underneath the Bruins’ lead duo, it’s hard to imagine a scenario in which ultimate responsibility doesn’t fall on at least one of them.
But the Bruins may want to secure proper cause to fire them over this. That’s where Lynch comes in.
“The easiest answer is, whoever was pounding the table the loudest saying ‘We gotta sign this kid’ is the guy who goes,” Ty added later in the Underground. “But who is that, and how do you find that?”