Mazz: Are Red Sox owners preparing for a sale?
This question comes up from time to time and now feels like a good time to ask it again: are the Red Sox owners preparing for a sale?
Before we go any further, let me make something clear here: I HAVE NO INSIDE INFORMATION. Every so often, this question gets asked and I usually say the same thing, which is no. That answer has always been the result of information I’ve gathered over the years from the Tom Yawkey/John Harrington (Yawkey Trust) Era to the current one under John Henry and Tom Werner. And that leads to another obvious question today.
Why the impetus to ask the question again now?
Because I feel like things have changed.
Now let me explain – or at least try to.
Whenever a team or corporation (and the Red Sox are both) starts to trim fat and curb spending, people immediately start to wonder whether a sale is coming. But when the Red Sox were sold the last time from the Yawkey lineage to this one, the opposite happened. During the winter of 2000-01, the Red Sox signed Manny Ramirez to an eight-year, $160 million contract that was then the richest in club history. Further, at the time, the Red Sox actually needed pitching to support right-hander Pedro Martinez – and their first pursuit of the offseason had been right-hander Mike Mussina, who went to the New York Yankees. In some ways, the Ramirez signing came out of nowhere.
Here’s the part we all missed at the time: the Red Sox were about to begin a new cable deal (with AT&T, if memory serves?) that was going to reward the club for every paid subscription by any AT&T subscribers. The more subscribers, the more revenue. The Red Sox needed stars and they needed compelling nightly content. Even then, before Henry and Werner, the business of the Red Sox was as much about the television show as the actual baseball team.
One year later, right around Christmastime, the Yawkey Trust reached an agreement to sell. The deal finalized in the spring of 2002 and the Red Sox changed forever.
Now let me say this: when Henry, Werner and Larry Lucchino took over the Red Sox, I feared the worst. All three came from small markets – Henry from the then-Florida Marlins, Werner and Lucchino from the San Diego Padres. I thought they wanted to run the Red Sox like the Oakland A’s and they even went so far as to pursue Billy Beane. As it turned out, the Red Sox went in the other direction and became one of the bigger spenders in baseball – the exact opposite of what they were under the Yawkey Trust and what many like me had predicted – winning championships in 2004, 2007, 2013 and, as we all know, 2018.
Now, let me add this: somewhere along the line, during all the winning, I once asked John Henry how long he and his partners intended to own the team: Henry cited a television show Werner had produced, Twenty Good Years, in which two aging friends vowed to enjoy the next stage of their lives. In the comment, Henry suggested that he and Werner had wondered whether they should extend that agreement to 25 years given how well things had been going.
The coming 2024 season will be their 23rd together in Boston.
So, again, the logical response: wait, you just said the previous ownership increased spending before announcing the team was up for sale. Haven’t these guys done the opposite? Yes, especially with regard to the singular big, burdensome, superstar contract – excluding Rafael Devers. But there are obvious differences between the Red Sox of 2002 and the Red Sox today. There are also obvious differences in baseball.
For starters, the 2002 Red Sox had a great deal of room for growth. The previous owners ran a mom-and-pop operation that did not come close to maximizing the Red Sox’ popularity or revenue streams. They lacked the vision or willingness to improve the ballpark. The new owners came in, invested in the team, improved Fenway Park, made NESN even more profitable. In the last 20-plus years – for better, worse or both – the Red Sox grew from a New England apple orchard into a national brand that became a monster at the box office and added seats above the left field wall. The owners that paid $770 million to buy the team and its properties now have an asset valued at more than $4.5 billion.
Oh, the value of the Sox will still go up in coming years.
But there is just no way it can continue to grow as rapidly as it has.
Now, what does that all mean? Good question. As many agree, the Red Sox feel like just a part of the portfolio amassed by the Fenway Sports Group, which also has a vested interest in international soccer, auto racing, the NHL and professional golf, among other entities. Maybe they want an NFL team. Maybe they want an NBA team. And maybe they are willing to effectively trade a baseball asset to get it, especially considering some of the realities that make baseball a tougher business than the others.
For starters: the NHL is a much smaller money-maker than baseball, but it has the firmest salary cap in sports. The NBA and NFL had malleable caps and, now, a far more popular products. Certainly, it’s possible that the Fenway Sports Group wants to add an NFL or NBA team to its list of holdings. But we all know that Henry, in particular, despises the revenue-sharing model that often costs the Red Sox tens of millions annually. On a percentage basis, baseball and the Red Sox just cannot be as profitable as they used to be, and that doesn’t even begin to address the concerns that now exist with NESN and regional sports networks.
Try Googling it. See what you come up it. Purely based on the numbers, Red Sox television ratings peaked in 2007. Those numbers have now dipped to less than 25 percent of what they were and the Sox have finished last three times in four years.
In the end, here’s the point: it might just be time.
So again, what has changed since 2001-2002? Only everything. The Red Sox don’t have nearly as much room for financial growth. The storyline of the curse is kaput. Baseball itself isn’t nearly as popular as it was. The regional sports networks are crumbling. For the Red Sox to have the rosiest future possible – from a business perspective, mind you – the team needs talented young players and a continuous stream of controllable assets. For a team that changed philosophies repeatedly over the years has now gone from Chaim Bloom to Craig Breslow, which feels like an attempt for better execution of the same plan.
If you ask me now, I think they’re getting ready to sell. Maybe later this year. Maybe next year. Maybe the year after.
That would give them their 25 years, some good and some bad.