Felger: The Bruins pants crapping has commenced

The Boston Bruins once again failed to close out an opponent lasty night at TD Garden as they fell to the Toronto Maple Leafs 2-1 in overtime in game 5. On Wednesday's Felger and Mazz, Felger let it be known that the Bruins have seemed to have started crapping their pants like they did last year.

Have the Bruins started yet another collapse? 

Felger: That was Ray Ferraro on the ESPN broadcast last night and I play that because I think it perfectly illustrates where we're at with the Bruins, and I think the outside perspective there is important and why, I anyway, always defer to the national broadcast because you get an outside opinion. You get something approaching an unbiased opinion. You get someone from the outside just looking at you with fresher eyes than you do, or we do on a daily basis. And Ray Ferraro, there doing color on ESPN, with the impeccable Sean McDonough, looks at you, that clip was from the 6:59 mark of the first period, he looks at you midway through the first period and says, "you guys aren't crapping your pants already, are you?" Jittery, feeling the pressure at home, they can't complete a five foot pass, he says. "Hey", he says, "Breathe. Just keep breathing. Nothing is lost". He's like talking him down off the ledge because he can see 13 minutes into the first period that they're crapping their pants. Isn't that something? And isn't it dead on....the pants crapping has commenced.

Jim Murray: It's like they're following the same script as last year. So whether you were watching on TV, lucky enough to be there like I was last night, that's the first time I heard Ferraro's call, he's right. Like it was evident. The puck was jumping off their stick. They were so tight right from the jump. And this was just like what this was last year in game five against Florida. You A-holes. You have this team who's bigger losers than you without their best player, who might be sick? Who the hell knows what's going on with Auston Matthews? They have a no name rookie goalie who you know just wants to turn into a puddle. And you were the bigger puddle last night because what? The weight of high expectations or you talked yourself into much that we're not going to do what we did last year, because I know Brad Marchand was cutting off reporters, even daring to bring that up before last night's game five. I mean I left there, I'm still pissed. Like that was the like "guys, let's repeat exactly what we did in game five last year".

Listen to Felger and Mazz from 2-6 every Monday-Friday on 98.5 The Sports Hub, with hosts Mike Felger, Tony “Mazz” Massarotti, and Jim Murray “Big Jim”. You can listen live in the Sports Hub App and subscribe to their podcasts here. Follow @FelgerAndMazz on Twitter to keep up with the show!

Up 3-1 in their first-round series with the Maple Leafs after a two-game sweep in Toronto last week, the Bruins came back to Boston and were quick to tell you that this year isn't like last year.

The past was the past, and the Bruins were ready to prove as much. What made that opportunity to special and unique — even with a different opponent, with this being Toronto and not Florida — is that the Bruins were essentially in the same spot they found themselves in through four games a year ago. They were up 3-1 on Toronto like they were on the Panthers, and they were coming off their absolute best two-game stretch when it came to pure, team hockey in a hostile environment.

It's admittedly rare in life that you get a second chance that's a near carbon copy of your previous failure, and in such short order. And when that opportunity comes, missing it or repeating your mistakes is the last thing you can afford to do.

But, boy, did Tuesday night's Game 5 overtime loss at TD Garden feel like something straight out of Apr. 2023.

When it comes to assessing where it went wrong for the Bruins in their 2-1 overtime loss to the Maple Leafs, the simplest question one can have is why? And more specifically, why did the Bruins mess with a winning lineup?

Up front, the Bruins decided to slow down their bottom six with Justin Brazeau thrown into action for his first game since Apr. 2 after an upper-body injury kept him out of action for the final six games of the regular season and first four games of the postseason. On the surface, throwing the 6-foot-5 Brazeau back into the fold made sense considering the Bruins' desire to get interior ice and generate more high-quality scoring chances (something Brazeau had thrived at in his 19-game run with Boston).

But the addition of Brazeau came at the expense of versatile fourth-line forward Johnny Beecher.

Despite finishing last Saturday's Game 4 with a minus-1 rating and losses in six of his seven battles at the dot, the 6-foot-3 Beecher came into the week as Boston's top faceoff option. In fact, his 54.8 percent success rate at the dot was the 17th-best figure among a group of 59 centers with at least 30 faceoffs this postseason entering Tuesday's slate.

And it took all of one period for the Bruins to feel his loss.

In the opening period of play. the Bruins lost a staggering 16 of their 20 faceoffs. They were especially bad at the dots closest to Jeremy Swayman, with losses in 10 of their 14 defensive-zone draws. That 'helped' keep the Bruins stuck in their own zone, and led to a first period that saw them out-shot 12-2 and out-attempted by an insane 28-7 mark during five-on-five play.

Their luck at the faceoff dot didn't get all that much better between the first intermission and the game-winning goal stuffed in Swayman's cage, either, as the Bruins lost 60 percent of their total faceoffs. The struggles at the dot were headlined by lefty center Pavel Zacha, who went just 4-for-17, including a 1-for-8 line against John Tavares.

Brazeau, meanwhile, finished without a shot or even a shot attempt in his 10:03 of time on ice.

The addition of Brazeau also gave the Bruins a bottom six that was not nearly fast enough between himself, Pat Maroon, and James van Riemsdyk. Given the way that the Bruins' speed and tenacity on the forecheck had routinely forced the Maple Leaf defense into penalties, turnovers, and ultimately goals in the back of their net, to move away from that anxiety-instilling approach with both Beecher and Jakub Lauko out of Boston's bottom-six grouping felt like something that made life easier for Toronto's backend.

This wasn't quite as drastic as breaking up Patrice Bergeron and Brad Marchand for the first time in almost a decade, but it was a strong deviation from some of the on-ice qualities that had given the Bruins success during their gutsy two-game tear in Toronto.

More on the Bruins

- Linus Ullmark gives honest insight into his feelings as backup

- The Sports Hub Underground with Matt Dolloff & Ty Anderson

- Complete coverage of the B's 2024 playoff run

And on the backend, after a day of intrigue when it came to potential changes, it was Matt Grzelcyk, not Derek Forbort, who drew back into action for the Black and Gold after sitting out as a healthy scratch for the previous two games.

Grzelcyk was replacing Kevin Shattenkirk, who played a defense-low 11:07 in Game 4 and was benched for the second half of the third period of Boston's Game 3 win, and at the end of that day, that alone wasn't the issue.

It's the fact that Jim Montgomery decided to go away from Grzelcyk for the second straight postseason, only to re-insert him in a top-four role the next time out there. There's not many defensemen in this league whose role is either healthy scratch or top-four fixture, and for the first half of this game, it felt like Grzelcyk was absolutely in his own head.

He struggled to make clean passes out of his own end, and was at times bailed out by the Leafs simply not being able to find the puck in their skates after a hemmed-in shift.

Grzelcyk would ultimately find his legs in the third period and put forth a strong third-period effort, with multiple keep-ins and individual battles in the attacking zone during what was Boston's best sustained push of the frame and a strong one-on-one battle win at the other end to keep this game tied late. But like he was in Game 5 a year ago, the 5-foot-9 Grzelcyk was on the ice for the overtime goal against and will naturally take on the bulk of the damage for it.

By now, Grzelcyk is who he is. If you're expecting him to suddenly become something he's not at 30 years old, that's on you. And this was the chief problem when the Bruins decided to keep him around for 2023-24. You simply had to feel as if the Bruins had to either fully commit to him (warts and all) or sever ties. This in-and-out style of deployment doesn't seem to work for anybody involved, and that felt obvious when you look at the way Grzelcyk seemed to be fighting it (in all respects) for the first half of this contest.

A Grzelcyk-for-Shattenkirk swap should never be a team's undoing, and I'm not even sure it was when you look at how the Bruins failed to do much of anything up front for entirely too long, but it's another example of fiddling and overthinking something that may not have needed such a drastic overhaul from Games 4 to 5.

This game even came with shades of 2023's Game 5 when Brad Marchand found himself unable to bury the would-be game-winning goal on Joseph Woll in the third period of action.

When that puck just sailed over the net, you had a feeling that it could come back to haunt them, and it did.

In a game where the Bruins had a chance to exorcise the demons of last year, they instead complicated things for themselves, and largely through their own doing. And to make matters worse, there were multiple instances of the Leafs simply dying to give this game to the Bruins, namely with a horrendous offensive-zone penalty (Toronto's seventh of the series) from William Nylander in the second period of play to large lulls in the second and third period where the Bruins were simply too cute against a goaltender making his first start in two weeks. Oh, and the Leafs played this game without their 69-goal scorer Auston Matthews as he continues to deal with an illness.

This was an opportunity that the Bruins simply couldn't let slip. Not if they were going to truly follow through on the talk that this year was indeed different and that they had learned something from last year's missteps.

"We weren't good enough," Montgomery said following the defeat. "Just simple as that. Toronto came out ready to play. They took it to us. Weren't ready to match their desperation.

"We just weren't good enough. We weren't good enough. I don't have something to give you that's concrete on what led to our slow start besides Toronto was better than us."

And now comes tuning out the outside noise — and as the series shifts back to always-noisy Toronto — while every decision will only be further scrutinized as flashbacks of last year creep into frame.