What led to the lack of tempo on the Patriots’ fourth quarter clock-killing drive?
Some football games have definitive moments. In the New England Patriots’ 21-17 loss to the Las Vegas Raiders on Sunday, it was more like a definitive march.
Following a Raiders field goal that made it a 19-10 game early in the fourth quarter, the Patriots got the ball at their own 25-yard line, with 13:03 to play in the game. Needing two scores, they proceeded to go on a 17-play, 78-yard charge that took 9:30 off the clock.
READ MORE:
—Free-fall continues with 21-17 loss to Raiders
—The latest on the Patriots’ quarterback carousel
—Full Patriots coverage
While the drive did result in a touchdown – a goal line punch in from Rhamondre Stevenson – the Patriots showed a noticeable lack of urgency for a team that would need another procession. Ultimately the Patriots would end up getting the ball one more time. But, because of the length of that previous scoring drive, they were forced into scramble mode starting at their own nine-yard line with no timeouts and 2:23 to go in the game.
One of the biggest questions coming away from this game will be why the Patriots didn’t show more urgency on that drive. After the game, quarterback Mac Jones was asked that very question.
“Honestly, I just try to get the call and call it in the huddle, and the coaches do a good job of managing all that stuff,” Jones replied when asked if he felt the offense was moving fast enough. “I did want to push the tempo obviously a little bit more, and just the operation and everything, but we were subbing a lot and – that’s part of putting pressure on the defense, is playing fast and getting in and out of the huddle to put the pressure on defense.”
Substituting does slow down offensive tempo. Whenever the offense makes a substitution between plays, the ball cannot be snapped ” until the Referee deems that the defense has had a reasonable time to complete its substitutions.” A ref will stand over the ball and prevent it from being snapped until such a period passes.
On the drive in question, the Patriots did substitute a lot. The 17-play drive actually had 20 snaps including penalties, and the Patriots never had the same group of players on the field for consecutive plays at any point. Of the 19 windows between plays, 11 came with the clock running. Again the Patriots subbed on all of them, including the three with the clock running inside the six-minute mark, when the ball was inside the red zone.
Still, that doesn’t excuse the lack of urgency. The Patriots could have either found a way to move the ball without substituting as much, or gotten the subs on and off the field immediately after the previous play, allowing that defensive substitution window to end earlier in the play clock.
That’s just one of what could be many reasons – and there were likely multiple at play at once – that the Patriots didn’t push the ball more. Was the coaching staff worried about pushing too hard with an offense that was moving the ball as well as it had in weeks? Did they see something on film about the Raiders defense that told them not to run hurry-up? Expect to hear plenty of theories this week.
Read more…