Bertrand: Elliott was basically free, a Christmas Tree Shop bargain
New details have emerged surrounding Ezekiel Elliott’s contract with the New England Patriots.
Inside of the one-year deal, the running back will earn a base salary of $1.55 million and a $600,000 signing bonus. Not to mention, the contract has a plethora of performance-based incentives. The deal is much more Patriots-friendly than initially reported.
On Thursday’s Zolak & Bertrand program, the guys weigh the pros and cons of adding Ezekiel Elliott to this year’s Patriots squad.
Parts of conversation abbreviated for clarity.
Bertrand: Ezekiel Elliott’s contract is worth far less than originally reported by Adam Schefter. This guy’s a bargain. I like the signing more today than yesterday, which is strange.
Zolak: It’s a win for the Patriots, man. If this works out, it’s a complete win for them. It’s low risk. It’s quite a humbling contract for him as an individual, considering where he’s come from and where he’s been.
Bertrand: I’m not annoyed anymore that they didn’t divert what I thought was 4 million in real money.
It’s weird because I’m always yelling about the Patriots not spending more money, so I don’t fully love the bargain basement finds. Right?
I don’t love them going to the Christmas Tree Shop for their running back, right? I don’t love that.
Zolak: Part of the narrative, this week, was, “Why wouldn’t you just $2 million more to go get Dalvin Cook?” That’s not the case, though.
Bertrand: That’s not the case! I’m not mad about not spending more for Dalvin Cook, not taking the money set for Zeke Elliott, or not taking a Hopkins deal. But here we are again with the Patriots looking for Filene’s Basement pieces for their team.
Zolak: This is like when you find a size 11.5 and 12 shoe and have to make them work together.
Bertrand: The guy’s a bargain! So, it would be crazy not to sign Zeke Elliott.
They didn’t outbid anybody for Zeke Elliott. They didn’t have to pay him to beat other teams. This guy is basically free. It doesn’t cost anything to do this.
So, yeah, it makes all the sense in the world. Of course, you would add Zeke Elliott over anything you had in the stable, so to speak. Why wouldn’t you do this? Yeah. I like the signing more now. The contract isn’t much money. They gave him nothing.
Zolak: I mean, you do have to add to the room. There will be issues with the room at some point this year. Injury-wise, that always happens. Have you seen that offensive line block? Somebody is going to get rolled up. Someone will get a high load and will have to miss a couple of games.
So, you bring in a veteran back, and if you hit on this sucker, it’s a big win. Contract-wise, as you said, he’ll have to hit every incentive to get paid. He’s never going to play 70 percent of the snaps.
Bertrand: I’m not sure he’ll hit the first incentive: 975 yards from scrimmage. I’m not convinced that will happen.
Zolak: I don’t think he will either because he’s so role-specific here. There’ll probably be games where he won’t touch the ball. I don’t know. That’s just the setup here.
James White has talked about this. He didn’t have a problem with it.
Bertrand: Here’s what they could have done. They could have signed Hopkins and Elliott. They could have done a million other things this offseason and still had Zeke Elliott.
This signing would have felt better if we felt like they didn’t have other holes to plug in on offense. They should’ve addressed the receiver and tackle positions—this is all part of a bigger-picture thing where they didn’t do enough offensively.
Zolak: It’s a headscratcher if you’re a Patriots fan.
Bertrand: I like that they added a cheap veteran who will add a little something and is better than what they had. But the whole offseason was them not doing enough offensively. And, not spending enough offensively and not committing enough resources to really improve this offense.